Culture
As you’re probably aware, now that it’s January, we’re running our annual public domain game jam, for games based on works from 1927. This is the 5th year we’ve done this, ever since the public domain (finally) returned to the US after decades with no works ever reaching the public domain, due to never-ending copyright term extension. Many people have noted that the terms seemed to extend just as Disney’s Mickey Mouse was about to enter the public domain. And while some scholars dispute the claim that Disney was the main lobbying force behind extensions, it’s uncanny how often the extensions seemed timed to Mickey’s unshackling.
A few years ago, though, it became clear that even Disney had given up on the idea of copyright term extension in the US (elsewhere, however…). After all, even one of the most extreme pro-copyright Copyright Registrars had suggested that perhaps it was time to scale back copyright terms (though only in the slightest of ways). The battle over the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act, followed by the battle over SOPA has (at least) taught the legacy copyright industries that they can’t just slip through never-ending extensions any more.
That didn’t stop a weird flood of articles last summer bemoaning the horror that would come from Disney losing the copyright on the Steamboat Willie version of Mickey Mouse, as it’s set to do on January 21st, 2024. Right before the New Year, the NY Times had a slightly more balanced article looking at what to expect on the freeing of Steamboat Willie Mickey in one year’s time.
For the first time, however, one of Disney’s marquee characters — Mickey himself — is set to enter the public domain. “Steamboat Willie,” the 1928 short film that introduced Mickey to the world, will lose copyright protection in the United States and a few other countries at the end of next year, prompting fans, copyright experts and potential Mickey grabbers to wonder: How is the notoriously litigious Disney going to respond?
As the article notes, this definitely isn’t a free-for-all for Mickey. The Steamboat Willie version is quite different from the Mickey most people know of today. It is true that Disney won’t be able to stop people from showing or sharing the original animation, but the company itself put it up on YouTube well over a decade ago anyway, so it’s free for all to see.
But there are other parts of the article that clearly suggest that Disney is prepping itself to use trademark law to scare off would-be adapters. This has always been something of a concern, and the article suggests that Disney itself has been quietly getting things ready for this kind of legal attack. As we’ve explained dozens of times, trademark and copyright law are different. Trademark law is really about not confusing or tricking the consumer into believing a product was made by someone else. So, really, the issue is in not making content that anyone might think would have come from Disney, which might wipe out a fair bit of content, but still leave plenty of open space.
But, also, trademark is about commerce, and the trademark holder has to be making use of the trademark in commerce in order for it to remain valid. But, as the article notes, over the past fifteen years or so, Disney has been gradually ramping up its commerce related to the Steamboat Willie version of Mickey.
In 2007, Walt Disney Animation Studios redesigned its logo to incorporate the “Steamboat Willie” mouse. It has appeared before every movie the unit has released since, including “Frozen” and “Encanto,” deepening the old character’s association with the company. (The logo is also protected by a trademark.) In addition, Disney sells “Steamboat Willie” merchandise, including socks, backpacks, mugs, stickers, shirts and collectibles.
My sense is that Disney will be cautiously litigious around Mickey. That is, I’m guessing that the aggressive IP enforcement team will be told not to go after just random uses of the Steamboat Willie version of Mickey, but anything borderline will bring down the lawyers screaming trademark infringement.
Of course, there’s another side to this not covered in the NY Times piece, which is that it’s unlikely Disney’s copyright in the Steamboat Willie version of Mickey is even valid in the first place. Beyond the fact that Steamboat Willie was a parody of Buster Keaton’s Steamboat Bill Jr. (which came out just a few months earlier, and will also be going into the public domain next January), a bunch of researchers have found pretty strong evidence that Disney screwed up the copyright filings for the film anyway, meaning it likely technically went into the public domain decades ago. It’s just that no one wanted to fight Disney’s litigation team on it.
Filed Under: copyright, mickey mouse, public domain, steamboat willie, trademark
Companies: disney
I’m looking forward to 2026 when the Floyd Gottfredson newspaper strips start hitting the PD, myself. Scrappy working-class Mickey is the best Mickey.
Croak: Mickey Mouse
Broke: Disney
Woke: Didny Worl.
S t o k e: Mortimer Mouse.
S P O K E : Rodney Rodent.
—_—
🙃
Watching the news cycle, I am looking forward to an extremely non-animated “Electroboat Elon” version to crop up eventually.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Write about this. Not how you hate Musk so much you’re gonna change what words mean to “got’em”.
And you say you’re not defending Elon. 🙃
[Matthew Bennett illiterately hallucinates events not found in reality]
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
you’re just saying random shit
You would speak from a wealth of experience. Unfortunately, you don’t hold a monopoly.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
No, but I hold a monopoly on deepthroating Elon Musk and Chozen at the same time. You’re mad just because you’re jealous.
Textbook case of gaslighting here, folks.
I’ll only believe it when it happens.
Until then, I’m going to assume Disney will pull out all the stops.
The evidence does seem good that Steamboat Willie will emter the public domain, however.
I expect a more likely scenario would be them using this as a test case for experimenting with how they can work around it, in preparation for when the 1938 Walt’s Field Day invitation Mickey, which went on to be adopted by artists within the company as the “new” design with the more familiar eyes to modern audiences, is due to enter the public domain.
So where copyright won’t do, trademark rides to the rescue, spaghetti-Western style, pop-guns blazing … no wonder some of us are such big fans of Blazing Saddles!
Copyright in the US seems to have been a bit of a mish-mash once upon a time – now it’s a stew of unidentifiable ingredients. Pete Seeger in the foreword to his 5-string Banjo book, the last edition, refers to the previous editions and says they are actually in the public domain, since he never got around to formally registering them with the Copyright Office, mandatory at the time. Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings, first pirated US edition, is likewise in the public domain because of some aspects of the then-current copyright law. (He got busy and introduced enough differences between that pirated edition and the official edition to be able to copyright it in the US.)
And we are still waiting for Disney Corp(se) to release the works the decomposing Walt Disney composed after his burial. Or have they been lying to us all the time? And extending the copyright term isn’t necessary to get decomposing composers composing? (And where do the decomposing authors get to spend their cash? That’s what everybody is wanting to know, gossip columnists not excluded.)
As someone who’s still pretty young, I’ve never seen a work go into the public domain in my life. I’m super fascinated at how this all plays out.
As someone who’s still pretty young, I’ve never seen a work go into the public domain in my life.
You’re in luck, it started back in 2019.
https://www.techdirt.com/2019/01/01/announcing-public-domain-game-jam-gaming-like-1923/
Exactly. The time of the year when we–the public–get gifts is not Christmas but a week afterwards on Public Domain Day.
As someone who’s still pretty young, I’ve never seen a work go into the public domain in my life.
You’re in luck, it started back in 2019.
https://www.techdirt.com/2019/01/01/announcing-public-domain-game-jam-gaming-like-1923/
2 The latest push to merchandise is king i think Trademark might work.
3 Trans Steamboat Wilie?
If Disney acts like Public Domain is not a thing, how do you explain the source of the majority of all their stories (e.g. Pinocchio, Beauty and the Beast, Robin Hood, etc.)?
Frankly, the whole gendering headache is quite uncalled for with cartoon animals. Either they have eyelashes or they don’t. Not much of a middle ground.
Mike, if you’re going to mention trademarks in this context, why not actually address the issue?
Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co., 305 U.S. 111 (1938)
Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003)
And also how dilution plays into this. What happens if you have a mark that is generic in some classes but fanciful, distinctive, and famous in others? Especially in light of Dastar?
Its obvious that its just a diet of “shit and pissed” (not a typo).
Stuck in the wrong century is just obsolete data.
As a bunch of pirates (aka copyright maximalists) keep saying: “Steal what you can, give nothing back.” (That’s right… from a Disney movie.)
Thank You for sharing the great information. This is very useful.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the “First Word” or “Last Word” on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »
Read the latest posts:
Read All »
Become an Insider!
This feature is only available to registered users.
You can register here or sign in to use it.
